WEBER’S THEORY OF INDUSTRIAL LOCATION
Introduction:
The principal aim of an industrial location
theory is to find out the economically best
location or optimal location which gives
maximum profits.
The maximum profits can be obtained when
the costs are minimum and the revenues are
maximum. therefore., industrial location
theories can be classified into two groups-
A. least coast location theories
B. maximum revenue location theories
❑ Industrial location theory was first
propounded by a German location economist,
Alfred weber in 1909, in his book ‘uberden
standart der industrien’. It was later
translated into English in 1929, as ‘ The
theory of the Location of Industries’.
❑ Weber’s theory of industrial location is very
comprehensive and known as ‘Least Cost
theory’.
❑ He was the first one to analyse the general
regional factors of transport and labour costs
as primary factors, and the agglomeration
costs as secondary factors, influencing the
optimal location of the manufacturing
industries.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Like other deductive theories, weber too offered
certain assumptions to analyse different cost
minimizing factors and processes and their impact on
industrial location.
1. The area is typically uniform or isotropic in form of
terrain or relief,climate,soils,economic
system,technology and distribution of population.
2. Manufacturing involves a single product at a time and the product is supplied to a single market.
3. Raw materials are not evenly distributed in space but a few known and fixed locations which are available at equal transportation cost throughout.
4. Markets are known and fixed at specific
places.
5. Labour is spatially fixed and immobile by
nature in general but is abundantly available
at particular wage level at particular places.
6. Transport costs are throughout equal,
increases with increasing linear distance and
weight of material.
7. Transportation route is the shortest distance
to destination.
8. There is perfect market competition.
9. Each commodity has uniform demand and
price.
The Perfect Competition is a
market structure where a large
number of buyers and sellers are
present, and all are engaged in the
buying and selling of the
homogeneous products at a single
price prevailing in the market.
IMPORTANT TECHNICAL TERMS:
1) Ubiquitous materials (Ubiquities): raw material used for
manufacturing which are available everywhere . Such materials
does not affect the selection of location. eg. Air, Sunlight
2) Localized materials- coal, gold, petroleum,and other minerals
3) Pure materials- which does not loose their weight in processing.
Eg: cotton, cotton yarns, etc
4) Gross materials : materials that loose weight during processing.
Eg. Sugercane, sugerbeet, bauxite ore, iron ore,etc.
5) Location weight- per unit weight of raw material + per unit
weight of finished products
6) Material Index: it indicates that location should be near market
or near raw material. Calculated as, Total localized materials
used/the weight of product.
7) Isodapane: according to Weber, it is a line joining the places
(points) having same transport cost per unit manufactured good.
DESCRIPTION OF THE THEORY:
Weber’s industrial Location theory
is analysed in two conditions-
1. Case of one raw material and one
market point, and
2. Case of two or more raw material
sources and one market point.
POSSIBILITIES OF THE LOCATION OF THE
INDUSTRY:
1. If ubiquitous material is used- there is no cost
of raw material so industry can be established
anywhere near market because there is no
transport cost of finished goods too.
2. If pure materials are used- industry may be
established at (i) the source of raw material (ii)
at market point (iii) at any point between raw
material and market. Total transport cost will
be equal in all these cases.
3. If gross materials are the raw material then
industry must be located near weight loosing
raw materials. Lighter finished products can be
transported al lower cost to market.
POSSIBILITIES IN THIS CASE-
1. If both raw materials are ubiquitous, it is advantageous
to set up factory near market. In this case transport
cost of raw materials and finished goods becomes zero.
2. if both raw materials are pure,it is advantageous to set
up the factory at market centre. Raw materials will be
brought to factory and there will be no transportation
cost on finished products. Thus transportation cost will
be minimum.
3. if industry uses both pure and ubiquitous materials
then, factory should set up near market. Transport cost
of pure and its finished goods will be same and
ubiquitous materials and its finished products has no
transportation cost. So, total transportation cost will be
minimum at market location.
4. If both raw materials are gross materials then, it
becomes difficult to find best location for industry.
Weber designed ‘locational triangle’ to solve this
problem
Market-consumption point(C)
One gross raw material source (A)
Other gross raw material source ( B), in
this case establishing industry at any of
these three location is not advantageous .
So, Optimal location has to be at any point
within this triangle made by A,B,C.
If weight of finished good is less than
raw materials then location will be
closer to raw materials .
Eg: Iron and steel industry
If weight of finished good is more
than raw materials then location will
be closer to market.
Eg. Bakery factory
IMPACT OF LABOUR AND AGGLOMERATION
ON THE LOCATION OF INDUSTRY
Weber’s industrial location theory is primarily
based on least cost of transport of raw materials
and finished goods, but Weber gives much
importance to Impact of labour source and
agglomeration of industry in a particular region.
(A) IMPACT OF LABOUR:
Acc. To Weber, labour is concentrated at some
definite places and different places have different
labour cost. In order to save labour cost, the
industry should be relocated away from the point
of the least transport cost.
Isodapane is the line joining those points where
increased transport costs are balanced by labour
movement cost savings.
(B) IMPACT OF AGGLOMERATION
❑ Agglomeration economies develop when a firm
produces items in mass or when many firms
cluster together in the same location.
It significantly influences the location of the
industries.
❑ Due to effect of agglomeration one may move to
place where the profit or advantage of
agglomeration will be more than the additional
increase in transport cost dur to deviation from
the least cost location.
EVALUATION OF THE THEORY:
This theory explains some basic influences on the
location of industries, but it has been criticised
mainly because of its assumptions and changed
circumstances related with technology,transport
system ,etc.
1.Most of the assumptions made by weber are not
realistic. Single market point is unrealistic as well
as transport cost do not increase proportionately
with distance and weight.
2.Weber has concentrated mainly on the transport
costs and has ignored the costs employed with
production process.
3. Weber has concentrated much on minimizing
costs and has given least emphasis on revenue.
4. Socio-cultural and political influences has
also been ignored by Weber, which are also a
deciding factor for setting up industries.
5. Weber’s single product, one firm, single
market centre, etc has been now replaced by
multi-product, multi-national corporations and
companies, import of raw materials from long
distance by sea routes have now become
common, unlike hi days early 20th century.



0 Comments